A core part of publication ethics is that when published research is affected by errors or misconduct, it must be corrected. This webinar explains both, the process of fixing errors and misconceptions about corrections, focusing on journal articles, and answering the questions:

  • Who decides what needs to be corrected?
  • What are the responsibilities of editors, journals, research institutions, and authors?
  • How are corrections done and what form do they take?
  • How do readers know when work has been corrected?
  • What are the barriers and solutions to correcting the scholarly literature?

Our expert speakers, including Gráinne McNamara (Research Integrity / Publication Ethics Manager, Karger) will draw on their experience in handling corrections and developing editorial policies.

Related Posts

Wooden figure holding up a falling row of domino-like blocks, preventing them from knocking over a line of upright blocks on a wooden surface, symbolizing stability, risk management, or interruption of a chain reaction.

The 2026 report on the Future of Peer Review puts industry wide numbers onto anecdotal reports from Editors and journals. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers who are…

Retro brass kitchen balance scale with symmetry displayed on wooden shelf.

This year for Peer Review Week we sat down with Dr. Sam Bose, the In-House Editor at Karger, to talk about how he experiences the challenges of this year’s theme….

Silhouette of a person seated at a desk, using a desktop computer. One hand rests near a keyboard while the other is raised to the chin in a thoughtful pose. The image is presented in profile, with substantial empty space surrounding the workstation.

AI can be a powerful tool in manuscript preparation. However, without careful oversight, use of this powerful tool can introduce substantial errors that may compromise your manuscripts’ accuracy and reliability….