Research reproducibility exists hand in hand with research integrity and good research practices.

Learn more about how peer review can improve manuscript reproducibility and strengthen research integrity in our recent round table discussion. Our panellists, Professor Max Cenci (clinical researcher in Dentistry from the Radboudumc, The Netherlands), Gráinne McNamara (Research Integrity / Publication Ethics Manager, Karger) and Marco Casola (Publication Manager, Karger), highlight some of the challenges researchers face in accessing and replicating data due to inadequate reporting and lack of transparency. They also stress the importance of researcher training, promotion of open peer review practices, peer-reviewer recognition and the adherence to reporting guidelines to effectively evaluate reproducibility in manuscripts.

Related Posts

Modern waterfront café at dusk with a glowing “OPEN” neon sign, calm water and hills in the background under a pastel sky.

Authors can publish Open Access without Article Processing Charges (APCs) in three Subscribe to Open (S2O) journals in 2026: European Addiction Research, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Pediatric Neurosurgery. Subscribe to Open…

Hand holding a pen while writing on paper, with a cup and reflections visible in the foreground.

The ability to read a scientific manuscript both critically and efficiently is not just an important skill to have as a reviewer, but can also help you understand how reviewers…

Crowd at a live concert with raised hands silhouetted against red stage lights and smoke.

It may be true that nearly every researcher wishes to be published. Though the hard work and learning from a research project are immeasurably valuable, a project isn’t really complete…