Research reproducibility exists hand in hand with research integrity and good research practices.

Learn more about how peer review can improve manuscript reproducibility and strengthen research integrity in our recent round table discussion. Our panellists, Professor Max Cenci (clinical researcher in Dentistry from the Radboudumc, The Netherlands), Gráinne McNamara (Research Integrity / Publication Ethics Manager, Karger) and Marco Casola (Publication Manager, Karger), highlight some of the challenges researchers face in accessing and replicating data due to inadequate reporting and lack of transparency. They also stress the importance of researcher training, promotion of open peer review practices, peer-reviewer recognition and the adherence to reporting guidelines to effectively evaluate reproducibility in manuscripts.

Related Posts

Every two years the World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI) gathers together the global community of individuals and organisations committed to upholding the integrity of research. This year’s conference covered…

A deep look into an eye

Are you interested in submitting your research to our journal Ophthalmologica? This podcast episode provides expert insights and tips to success from Martin Zinkernagel (Ophthalmologica, Editor-in-chief) and Marco Casola (Publication Manager, Karger). Listen now

Bricks displaying the words "action" and "correction"

A core part of publication ethics is that when published research is affected by errors or misconduct, it must be corrected. This webinar explains both, the process of fixing errors…